Tracking List: CHIP Children and Families

HB1593 (HD3605) - An Act protecting minors from the creation of computer-generated child sexual abuse visual materials
Sponsor: Rep. Natalie Blais (D)
Co-sponsors: Sen. Joanne Comerford (D), Rep. Natalie Higgins (D), Sen. James B. Eldridge (D)
Overview:

Creates a criminal offense for creating child sexual abuse visual material with lascivious intent when the person knows, or has reason to know, the depicted person is a minor, punishable by up to 10 years in state prison or 2½ years in a house of correction, a $10,000-$50,000 fine, or both.

Defines "child sexual abuse visual material" to include photographs, films, videos, pictures, or computer-generated or altered images that would falsely appear to a reasonable person to depict an authentic representation of a minor engaged in sexual conduct or sexual excitement, or in a state of nudity or partial nudity; applies this definition to the offense of knowing purchase or possession of such material; and permits proof of minority through testimony by the child, production personnel, or observers, or through expert medical testimony based on the material.

This overview was generated by AI and may contain errors. Please verify for accuracy.
Summary:
No summary available yet.
Bill Text: 03/18/2025 - As Filed (PDF)
Progress: House: Favorable
Status: Judiciary
HB1811 (HD1788) - An Act requiring clean slate automated record sealing
Sponsor: Rep. Mary Keefe (D)
Co-sponsors: Rep. Andres Vargas (D), Rep. Tram Nguyen (D), Rep. Bud Williams (D), Rep. Lindsay Sabadosa (D), Rep. Natalie Higgins (D), Rep. Erika Uyterhoeven (D), Sen. Rebecca Rausch (D), Rep. Carmine Gentile (D), Rep. Steven Owens (D), Rep. Sean Reid (D), Rep. Sam Montaño (D), Rep. Mike Connolly (D), Rep. David LeBoeuf (D), Rep. John Moran (D), Rep. James Arena-DeRosa (D), Rep. Patricia Duffy (D), Rep. Margaret Scarsdale (D), Rep. Christopher Worrell (D), Rep. Manny Cruz (D), Rep. Dan Sena (D), Rep. Adrian Madaro (D), Rep. Marjorie Decker (D), Rep. Chris Hendricks (D), Rep. Daniel Cahill (D), Sen. James B. Eldridge (D), Rep. Tara Hong (D), Rep. Antonio F.D. Cabral (D), Rep. Chynah Tyler (D), Rep. Michelle DuBois (D), Sen. Jason M. Lewis (D), Rep. Russell E. Holmes (D), Sen. Michael O. Moore (D), Rep. Tricia Farley-Bouvier (D), Rep. Christine Barber (D), Rep. David Paul Linsky (D), Rep. Brandy Fluker-Reid (D), Rep. Joshua Tarsky (D), Rep. Shirley Arriaga (D), Rep. Tommy Vitolo (D), Rep. James J. O'Day (D), Rep. Homar Gómez (D), Rep. Rita Mendes (D), Rep. Greg Schwartz (D), Rep. Steven Ultrino (D), Rep. David M. Rogers (D), Rep. Bridget Plouffe (D)
Overview:

This bill introduces a system for the automated and expedited sealing of criminal records in Massachusetts. Under the bill, individuals no longer need to petition for the sealing of eligible criminal records after completing a designated waiting period. An automated mechanism will seal records within 30 days of eligibility, with waiting periods set at 3 years for misdemeanors and 7 years for felonies, provided there are no new offenses. However, certain firearm and government-related offenses are excluded from sealing, with exceptions for resisting arrest and decriminalized marijuana possession, which can be sealed upon request. For juvenile records, the bill introduces an automatic sealing process occurring 3 years post-offense or adjudication, absent any new offenses.

The bill directs the Commissioner of Probation and the Department of Criminal Justice Information Services to maintain records to include these release dates. The legislation also requires the commissioner to inform individuals at conviction or adjudication about the possibility of future record sealing.

This overview was generated by AI and may contain errors. Please verify for accuracy.
Summary:
Amends GL 276:100A (Sealing of criminal records) and GL276:100B (Sealing of delinquency records) to eliminate current procedure of petition to court to request sealing and instead providing that certain records shall be sealed automatically after the statutory waiting period (7 years for criminal felonies; 3 years for criminal misdemeanors and delinquency records) provided that no new offenses have occurred; exempts certain offenses from automatic sealing process; directs commissioner of probation and commissioner of public safety to develop and implement computer systems for sealing; provides effective date of 18 months after passage.
Bill Text: 03/18/2025 - As Filed (PDF)
Progress: House: Favorable
Status: Judiciary
HB3159 (HD3456) - An Act supporting family caregivers
Sponsor: Rep. Michael Kushmerek (D)
Co-sponsors: Rep. David M. Rogers (D), Rep. Adam Scanlon (D), Sen. Joanne Comerford (D), Rep. Natalie Blais (D), Rep. Kenneth I. Gordon (D), Rep. Tara Hong (D), Sen. Jake Oliveira (D), Rep. Sean Reid (D), Rep. Brian Murray (D), Sen. Michael D. Brady (D), Rep. Lindsay Sabadosa (D), Rep. Colleen M. Garry (D), Rep. Jennifer B. Armini (D), Rep. Paul McMurtry (D), Rep. William C. Galvin (D), Rep. Richard Wells Jr. (D), Rep. Adrian Madaro (D), Rep. Erika Uyterhoeven (D), Rep. Patrick Kearney (D), Rep. James Arena-DeRosa (D), Rep. Steven Owens (D), Rep. Thomas M. Stanley (D), Sen. Jason M. Lewis (D), Rep. Mindy Domb (D), Rep. Susannah M. Whipps (I), Rep. Sam Montaño (D), Sen. Bruce E. Tarr (R), Rep. Carmine Gentile (D), Rep. Natalie Higgins (D), Rep. Thomas Moakley (D), Rep. David Biele (D), Sen. James B. Eldridge (D), Rep. Kristin Kassner (D), Sen. Joan B. Lovely (D), Rep. Lisa Field (D), Rep. John Marsi (R), Rep. Margaret Scarsdale (D), Rep. Steven Xiarhos (R), Rep. Michelle Badger (D), Rep. Brandy Fluker-Reid (D)
Overview:

The bill supports family caregivers, including a voucher program allowing claims of up to $1,500 for respite service expenses, subject to income qualifications. Additionally, a refundable tax credit of up to $1,500 is available for costs incurred in home modifications, equipment purchases, and caregiving services, also contingent upon income eligibility The bill also allows spouses to be compensated as caregivers under MassHealth, contingent federal approval. 

The bill also extends anti-discrimination protections to include individuals based on their status as family caregivers, ensuring they are not subject to discrimination in various contexts, and creates an advisory council on family caregiving, which will provide guidance to the state’s executive office and legislature on caregiving policies. 

This overview was generated by AI and may contain errors. Please verify for accuracy.
Summary:
No summary available yet.
Bill Text: 03/18/2025 - As Filed (PDF)
Progress: House: Favorable
Status: Revenue
SB335 (SD654) - An Act promoting safe technology use and distraction-free education for youth
Sponsor: Sen. Julian A. Cyr (D)
Co-sponsors: Sen. Nicholas P. Collins (D), Sen. Barry Finegold (D), Rep. Mike Connolly (D)
Overview:

This bill requires schools to limit student access to personal electronic devices during the school day. Exceptions are made for emergencies or educational needs. Schools must communicate these policies to parents and submit them to the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education for oversight and guidance. Schools must also educate students on the social, emotional, and physical risks of social media use.

Social media platforms must implement nearly foolproof age verification systems and establish default privacy-focused settings for minors, including permitting communication and content sharing only with established connections, disabling features like autoplay and continuous scrolling, and barring access during certain hours, such as nighttime and school hours. Platforms are also required to include mechanisms for flagging unwanted content and must issue health warnings related to social media use. 

This overview was generated by AI and may contain errors. Please verify for accuracy.
Summary:
The bill is divided into two main components, one dealing with the use of personal electronic devices in school settings (amending Chapter 71), and the second establishing a new chapter regulating social media (Chapter 93M). Additions to Chapter 71 (§§101-102) provide as follows: Each public school must have and inform families about a policy governing students’ use of personal electronic devices (phones, tablets, smartwatches, etc.) during school hours and school-sponsored activities. The policy must (1) prohibit physical access to these devices during the school day, unless a school administrator authorizes access for a specific student, the (2) device is used according to an Individualized Education Program or Section 504 plan, or (3) there is an emergency. Each public school must also have a policy to educate students about the social, emotional, and physical risks and harms of social media use, and that policy must meet certain criteria. New Chapter 93M (“Online Protection”) provides as follows: Digital platforms must implement systems to verify or assure users’ ages with 99% accuracy. There must be a process allowing users to appeal if they are wrongly designated as a minor, with documentary evidence, and a decision must come within 3 days. Any data collected for age assurance (or appeals) must be kept separate and confidential and not used for other purposes. Platforms must set minors’ accounts to privacy-protecting defaults, including (1) providing that visibility, sharing and messages be restricted to connected accounts. There must be procedures to cap the amount of time that a minor can be on-line, such as 1½ hours per 24-hour period and a forced 10-minute break after 20 minutes continuous use; parents may raise the cap for minors at their own discretion. There must be procedures for parents or minors to request restriction of public visibility or deletion of accounts (with specified turnaround times. Platforms are to be required to report how they track minor users’ interactions, including how algorithms assess content relevance and preferences for minors, statistics about minor users’ activities, notification practices, details of “experiments” (e.g. feature tests) involving 1,000+ minors, including results, and weekly surveys of minors about harmful or unwanted experiences on the platform, among other things. Violations of the chapter are to be treated as unfair or deceptive trade practices within the meaning of Chapter 93A. Violations are to be punishable by fines of up to $5,000 per violation for breaches of age verification or default settings rules, and  up to $1 million per day for failure to meet transparency and reporting obligations.
Bill Text: 03/18/2025 - As Filed (PDF)
Progress: Senate: Favorable
Status: Reported favorably as amended by Joint Committee
SB461 (SD1482) - An Act to protect children's learning, focus, and emotional health during school hours
Sponsor: Sen. John Velis (D)
Co-sponsors: Rep. Carmine Gentile (D), Rep. James Arena-DeRosa (D), Sen. Paul Feeney (D), Rep. Lindsay Sabadosa (D), Rep. Mike Connolly (D), Sen. Joanne Comerford (D)
Overview:

Requires school boards to adopt and enforce policies mandating that students' personal electronic communication devices-such as smartphones, tablets, smartwatches, wearables, and gaming devices-be turned off, locked away, and inaccessible for the entire school day and during any supervised school-related program, with access to a school-designated telephone for contacting parents and strict compliance provisions for students and employees; exempts device possession or use when medically necessary as determined by a licensed physician or required by a student's IEP or Section 504 plan.

Prohibits districts, employees, and volunteers from using social media to communicate with students; from allowing student access to social media or gaming apps during school hours or on school property; and from permitting social media access on school-issued devices, which must be configured to block such sites-while preserving school-to-parent/community communications and routine academic uses of email, shared documents, internet research, and electronic assignment submission.

Requires annual data collection on impacts to behavior, mental health, disciplinary incidents, attendance, and academic performance.

This overview was generated by AI and may contain errors. Please verify for accuracy.
Summary:
No summary available yet.
Bill Text: 03/18/2025 - As Filed (PDF)
Progress: Senate: Favorable
Status: Attached to favorable report by Joint Committee
SB1124 (SD1356) - An Act to remove collateral consequences and protect the presumption of innocence
Sponsor: Sen. Adam Gómez (D)
Co-sponsors: Sen. Joanne Comerford (D), Sen. Rebecca Rausch (D), Rep. Sean Reid (D), Sen. Patricia D. Jehlen (D), Sen. Liz Miranda (D), Sen. Sal N. DiDomenico (D), Rep. Manny Cruz (D), Sen. Pavel Payano (D)
Overview:

Establishes automatic, immediate sealing of criminal and juvenile case records when an offense does not result in a conviction or adjudication, absent the individual's objection at final disposition-including completion of any court-ordered supervision-with no petition or waiting period; permits later sealing upon request if the person initially objected.

Defines "conviction" for these purposes solely as a finding of guilt, excluding a continuance without a finding or a file disposition without a finding of guilt, and specifies that "guilty file" dispositions also carry no waiting period. Requires the Department to include a written presumption-of-innocence statement when providing criminal offender record information on pending charges or non-convictions, guarantees individuals and their legal representatives access to their sealed records without a court order with fees waived for indigent persons, and reduces criminal offender record information access limits by lowering specified numeric thresholds from 10 to 7 and from 5 to 3.

This overview was generated by AI and may contain errors. Please verify for accuracy.
Summary:
No summary available yet.
Bill Text: 03/18/2025 - As Filed (PDF)
Progress: Senate: Favorable
Status: Senate Ways & Means
SB1166 (SD1411) - An Act relative to enhancing hiring practices to prevent sexual abuse
Sponsor: Sen. Joan B. Lovely (D)
Co-sponsors: Sen. Joanne Comerford (D), Rep. Susannah M. Whipps (I), Sen. Dylan Fernandes (D), Sen. John F. Keenan (D)
Overview:

Requires school districts, charter and nonpublic schools, and contracted service providers to conduct comprehensive pre-employment screening for positions with direct or regular student contact-collecting applicant disclosures and authorizations; contacting former employers about any abuse or sexual misconduct investigations, discipline, separations, or license actions; verifying certification and eligibility; and checking the Department of Children and Families Central Registry, with any substantiated physical or sexual abuse disqualifying the applicant. Mandates follow-up requests when affirmative responses arise, permits provisional hiring for up to 90 days under specified conditions, bars hiring when applicants withhold required information, compels responses on standardized forms, protects good-faith disclosers, and makes received information confidential and limited to fitness determinations.

Establishes tailored rules for substitutes and contracted service providers-allowing initial reviews to remain valid within the same entity, requiring contractors to maintain records and notify schools of known incidents, and allowing schools to object to assignments after disclosure. Prohibits agreements or assistance that facilitate re-employment of individuals known or with probable cause to have engaged in sexual misconduct (subject to specified exceptions) and voids agreements that interfere with mandatory reporting or criminal processes; assigns enforcement to the Attorney General with civil penalties up to $10,000, authorizes contractor debarment for willful violations and referrals to licensing authorities, directs the Department of Education to collect and annually report aggregate data and develop standardized forms and notices, authorizes the Board of Education to promulgate regulations, and provides liability protections without creating a specific duty of care.

This overview was generated by AI and may contain errors. Please verify for accuracy.
Summary:
No summary available yet.
Bill Text: 03/18/2025 - As Filed (PDF)
Progress: Senate: Favorable
Status: Judiciary
SB1174 (SD1993) - An Act protecting minors from the creation of computer-generated child sexual abuse visual materials
Sponsor: Sen. Paul W. Mark (D)
Co-sponsors: Sen. Joanne Comerford (D), Sen. Joan B. Lovely (D), Sen. James B. Eldridge (D)
Overview:

Criminalizes the creation, with lascivious intent and knowing or having reason to know the person depicted is a minor, of "child sexual abuse visual material," punishable by up to 10 years in state prison or 2½ years in a house of correction and fines of $10,000-$50,000.

Defines "child sexual abuse visual material" to include photographs, films, videos, pictures, and computer-generated images depicting sexual conduct, sexual excitement, or a minor in nudity or partial nudity that have been created, adapted, modified, or otherwise altered-including through digitization-to falsely appear to be, or include, an authentic depiction of a minor.

Authorizes proof that the person depicted is a minor through the child's testimony, testimony from a producer or observer of the material, or expert medical testimony based on physical appearance or inspection of the material, and applies this definition to the offense of knowing purchase or possession of such visual material.

This overview was generated by AI and may contain errors. Please verify for accuracy.
Summary:
No summary available yet.
Bill Text: 03/18/2025 - As Filed (PDF)
Progress: Senate: Favorable
Status: Judiciary
SB1938 (SD1509) - An Act supporting family caregivers
Sponsor: Sen. Joanne Comerford (D)
Co-sponsors: Sen. Jason M. Lewis (D), Sen. Michael D. Brady (D), Sen. Jake Oliveira (D), Sen. Patricia D. Jehlen (D), Sen. John F. Keenan (D), Sen. Sal N. DiDomenico (D), Sen. Michael O. Moore (D), Sen. James B. Eldridge (D), Sen. William Driscoll (D), Rep. Thomas M. Stanley (D), Sen. John Velis (D), Rep. Susannah M. Whipps (I), Sen. Dylan Fernandes (D), Sen. Bruce E. Tarr (R), Sen. Joan B. Lovely (D)
Overview:

The bill supports family caregivers, including a voucher program allowing claims of up to $1,500 for respite service expenses, subject to income qualifications. Additionally, a refundable tax credit of up to $1,500 is available for costs incurred in home modifications, equipment purchases, and caregiving services, also contingent upon income eligibility The bill also allows spouses to be compensated as caregivers under MassHealth, contingent federal approval. 

The bill also extends anti-discrimination protections to include individuals based on their status as family caregivers, ensuring they are not subject to discrimination in various contexts, and creates an advisory council on family caregiving, which will provide guidance to the state’s executive office and legislature on caregiving policies. 

This overview was generated by AI and may contain errors. Please verify for accuracy.
Summary:
The bill makes a number of changes across Massachusetts law, largely around supporting family caregivers, expanding access to prescription refills during emergencies, and providing tax credits and respite support. In particular: Creates a new 27-member “Advisory Council on Family Caregiving,” including the Secretaries of Health & Human Services, Aging & Independence, Public Health, Veterans’ Services, and Labor & Workforce Development), chairs of Elder Affairs committees, plus 10 appointed members drawn from various caregiver advocates, caregivers, health care providers, academic representatives, advocacy orgs) Establishes respite vouchers for family caregivers under which family caregivers can receive vouchers of up to 100% of eligible expenditures. For individual caregivers income limits top out at $135,000 annual income; for households up to $250,000 combined. These thresholds are adjusted annually based on Social Security cost-of-living adjustments. Establishes tax credits for family caregivers, with eligibility income limits of less than $75,000 for individuals and $150,000 for couples, and a maximum credit of $1,500 per taxable year. Amends provisions of the Unemployment Statute to establish that someone who can demonstrate that they act as a family caregiver is considered “available for work” within the meaning of the statute. Amends the anti-discrimination law to clarify that a person may not be discriminated against in matters of housing because they are a family caregiver. Establishes that during a declared state of emergency employees insured under state group insurance, Medicaid managed care, individual and group health plans, HMOs, etc. must be provided with an additional 30-day supply of any current prescription for insured persons, at the same coverage level as a normal refill. Requires that the state take actions (and obtain federal approvals if needed) to allow spouses to serve as paid caregivers in the MassHealth program.
Bill Text: 03/18/2025 - As Filed (PDF)
Progress: Senate: Favorable
Status: Revenue
SB2549 - An Act to promote student learning and mental health
Sponsor: Joint Committee on Education
Co-sponsors: Rep. Donald Berthiaume Jr. (R), Sen. Paul Feeney (D), Sen. Brendan Crighton (D), Sen. Barry Finegold (D), Rep. Lindsay Sabadosa (D), Sen. Julian A. Cyr (D), Sen. Nicholas P. Collins (D), Sen. Mark C. Montigny (D), Rep. Mike Connolly (D), Rep. Carmine Gentile (D), Sen. John Velis (D), Sen. John F. Keenan (D), Sen. Joanne Comerford (D), Sen. Patrick O'Connor (R), Rep. James Arena-DeRosa (D), Sen. John Cronin (D)
Overview:

Requires every public school or district to adopt and implement by the start of the 2026-2027 school year a personal electronic device policy that, at minimum, prohibits student physical access to such devices during the school day and sets standards for use on school grounds and at school-sponsored activities beyond the school day. Mandates clear exceptions for health and safety, disability-related accommodations (IEPs, 504 plans, ADA), travel to off-campus learning, multilingual learners, emergencies, and staff direction; requires one or more methods for parent-student contact during the day; and requires enforcement provisions applicable to students and employees that prevent inequitable discipline; policies may vary by grade level, must be approved by the appropriate governing body, and must be communicated to families.

Directs the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education to issue guidance and model policies within 180 days-addressing avoidance of personal use of school-issued devices, options for secure storage of personal devices during the school day, and equitable enforcement-requires schools or districts to file their policies with the Department, requires regular updates to the guidance, and requires a report by December 31, 2027, on the impact of school personal device prohibitions.

This overview was generated by AI and may contain errors. Please verify for accuracy.
Summary:
Adds new Section 101 to GL c. 71 (Public Schools) requiring districts to have a policy in place restricting the use of phones or other personal electronic devices by students; provides for said policies to include a prohibition on physical access to said devices during the school day, as well as standards for their use on school grounds and during school-sponsored activities where applicable; outlines possible exceptions to the policy, including as it relates to student health and safety, use in accordance with an IEP or disability accommodations, time spent off campus, emergencies, or other reasonable exceptions; requires each district’s policy to include one or more methods for parents or guardians to contact students during the day, as well as enforcement provisions; additionally, requires DESE to provide guidance and recommendations to assist districts in developing and implementing the phone ban, and requires implementation of these policies prior to the start of the 2026-2027 school year.
Bill Text: 07/10/2025 - As Filed (PDF)
Progress: Senate: Referred to Cmte
Status: Senate Ways & Means
SB2561 - An Act to promote student learning and mental health
Sponsor: Senate Committee on Ways & Means
Co-sponsors: Sen. Julian A. Cyr (D), Sen. Brendan Crighton (D), Sen. John Cronin (D), Sen. John F. Keenan (D), Sen. Patrick O'Connor (R), Sen. John Velis (D), Sen. Mark C. Montigny (D), Rep. Carmine Gentile (D), Sen. Nicholas P. Collins (D), Rep. Donald Berthiaume Jr. (R), Rep. James Arena-DeRosa (D), Sen. Barry Finegold (D), Sen. Paul Feeney (D), Rep. Mike Connolly (D), Rep. Lindsay Sabadosa (D), Sen. Joanne Comerford (D)
Overview:

Requires every public school and district to adopt and enforce a policy prohibiting student use and on-person possession of personal electronic devices on school grounds during the school day-including recess, lunch, and passing periods-and during school-sponsored activities held during the school day; mandates equitable, non-exclusionary enforcement that prohibits expulsion or suspension and requires at least one method for parent-student contact; and permits limited exceptions for IEP/504 or ADA accommodations, documented health needs, off-campus travel to learning opportunities, and case-specific exemptions such as emergencies, safety, teacher-directed instructional use, or multilingual learners.

Directs the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education, after public input, to issue within 180 days guidance, recommendations, and a model policy-covering secure storage options, preventing personal use of school-issued devices, and enforcement safeguards-and to update them annually; if a local policy is not approved by September 1, the model policy takes effect.

Requires annual filing of local policies with the Department and annual notice to families, allows developmentally appropriate variations that do not expand use or possession beyond authorized exceptions, requires implementation before the 2026-2027 school year, and requires a report on implementation by December 31, 2027.

This overview was generated by AI and may contain errors. Please verify for accuracy.
Summary:
Adds new Section 102 to GL c. 71 (Public Schools) requiring districts to have a policy in place restricting the use of phones or other personal electronic devices by students. In particular: Provides for those policies to include a prohibition on the use and physical possession of said devices during the school day, including during recess, lunch period, and school-sponsored activities; Outlines possible exceptions to the policy, including as it relates to student health and safety, use in accordance with an IEP or disability accommodations, time spent off campus, emergencies, or other reasonable exceptions; Requires each district’s policy to include one or more methods for parents or guardians to contact students during the day, as well as enforcement provisions; Requires DESE to provide guidance and recommendations to assist districts in developing and implementing the phone ban, including the development of a model policy; Requires districts to have a policy in place prior to the start of the 2026-2027 school year, with DESE’s model policy taking effect in districts that fail to adopt one of their own; Requires DESE to file a report with the legislature by December 31, 2027 regarding the implementation of the phone ban.
Bill Text: 07/24/2025 - As Filed (PDF)
Progress: House: Read Third
Status: Passed in the Senate
SB2581 - An Act to promote student learning and mental health
Sponsor: Printed As Amended
Co-sponsors: Sen. Julian A. Cyr (D), Sen. Brendan Crighton (D), Sen. John Cronin (D), Sen. John F. Keenan (D), Sen. Patrick O'Connor (R), Sen. John Velis (D), Sen. Mark C. Montigny (D), Rep. Carmine Gentile (D), Sen. Nicholas P. Collins (D), Rep. Donald Berthiaume Jr. (R), Rep. James Arena-DeRosa (D), Sen. Barry Finegold (D), Sen. Paul Feeney (D), Rep. Mike Connolly (D), Rep. Lindsay Sabadosa (D), Sen. Joanne Comerford (D)
Overview:

Requires every public school or district to adopt and enforce a policy prohibiting student use and on-person possession of personal electronic devices on school grounds during the school day-including recess, lunch, and passing time-and during school-sponsored activities held in the school day. Mandates at least one method for parent-student contact, including for emergencies; bars expulsion or suspension for violations while requiring safeguards against inequitable discipline; and limits exemptions to IEP/504 or other legal accommodations, documented medical necessity, off-campus travel to other learning opportunities, or case-specific exemptions authorized in the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education's model policy.

Authorizes policies to vary by developmental level and school schedules but not to permit device use or on-person possession beyond those exemptions; requires annual notice to families and approval by the local governing body after public input; defaults to the Department's model policy if a local policy is not approved by September 1; and sets an adoption deadline before the 2026-2027 school year. Directs the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education to issue recommendations, guidance, and a model policy within 180 days-including secure storage options, limits on personal use of school-issued devices, and enforceable compliance provisions-to solicit public input, review and update materials annually to reflect research and technological advances (including technology that may render devices inoperable), collect annual policy filings, and report on implementation by December 31, 2027.

This overview was generated by AI and may contain errors. Please verify for accuracy.
Summary:
Adds new §102 to GL 71 (Public Schools) requiring districts to have a policy in place restricting the use of phones or other personal electronic devices by students. In particular: Provides for those policies to include a prohibition on the use and physical possession of phones or other devices during the school day, including during recess, lunch period, and school-sponsored activities; Outlines possible exceptions to the policy, including as it relates to student health and safety, use in accordance with an IEP or disability accommodations, time spent off campus, emergencies, or other reasonable exceptions; Requires each district’s policy to include one or more methods for parents or guardians to contact students during the day, as well as enforcement provisions; Requires DESE to provide guidance and recommendations to assist districts in developing and implementing the phone ban, including the development of a model policy; Requires districts to have a policy in place prior to the start of the 2026-2027 school year, with DESE’s model policy taking effect in districts that fail to adopt one of their own; Requires DESE to file a report with the legislature by December 31, 2027 regarding the implementation of the phone ban. New draft of SB2561. The new draft makes grammatical and technical corrections to the previous bill.
Bill Text: 08/01/2025 - As Filed (PDF)
Progress: Senate: Referred to Cmte
Status: House Ways & Means